I couldn't find a good, short, easy explanation about regular Spanish verbs. And as I never really took the time to learn them (after almost a year of learning Spanish xD) I decided to make a quick chart to study, and some pinpoints for when to use them.
Present | Preterite | ||||
habl o habl as habl a habl amos habl áis habl an | com o com es com e com emos com éis com en | viv o viv es viv e viv imos viv ís viv e | habl é habl aste habl ó habl amos habl asteis habl aron | com í com iste com ió com imos com isteis com ieron | viv í viv iste viv ió viv imos viv isteis viv ieron |
Imperfect | Future | ||||
habl aba habl abas habl aba habl ábamos habl abais habl aban | com ía com ías com ía com íamos com íais com ían | viv ía viv ías viv ía viv íamos viv íais viv ían | hablar é hablar ás hablar á hablar emos hablar éis hablar án | comer é comer ás comer á comer emos comer éis comer én | vivir é vivir ás vivir á vivir emos vivir éis vivir én |
Conditional | Subjunctive | ||||
hablar ía hablar ías hablar ía hablar íamos hablar íais hablar ían | comer ía comer ías comer ía comer íamos comer íais comer ían | vivir ía vivir ías vivir ía vivir íamos vivir íais vivir ían | habl e habl es habl e habl emos habl éis habl en | com a com as com a com amos com áis com an | viv a viv as viv a viv amos viv áis viv an |
Gerund | Past participle | ||||
habl ando | com iendo | viv iendo | habl ado | com ido | viv ido |
Present
Pretty obvious when to use this, same as in English
Preterite
Past tense. You use this one when:
- Something occurred at a fixed point in time
- Something was done a specific number of times
- Describing a chain of events
- Something occurred in a specific enclosed period of time
- Describing a sudden change of mood
(…in the past)
So, generally, you use the preterite when you know exactly when something happened.
Imperfect
Another past tense. This is used:
- When talking about actions that occurred repeatedly
- When something occurred over an extended period of time
- To start off something you describe, like ‘we were going home when… ‘
- When describing feelings and mental actions
(of course, in the past)
Future
You use this when usually in English you would use will or shall. For things in the near future it’s usually better to use ‘ir a’, for things further in the future, use the future tense. It’s also used to express wonder or probability in the present tense (‘who could she be?’).
Note that in the future tense, the endings get added to the complete verb and not tot the stem.
Conditional
This is a very easy one as all you need to do is add the endings of the imperfect (in –er and –ir) to the complete verb (like in the future). This makes it basically a future in the past.
It’s often used wonder or probability in the past (‘who could she have been?’), but also just to describe the future from the perspecrtive of the past.
Subjunctive
The subjunctive is usually used to express doubt, hope, a wish, an opinion.. anything that’s not objective or a fact. It can be quite tricky. It is NOT used with these expression:
creer que ...
to believe that ...
to believe that ...
no dudar que ...
to not doubt that ...
to not doubt that ...
es cierto que ...
it is certain that ...
it is certain that ...
es claro que ...
it is clear that ...
it is clear that ...
es evidente que ...
it is certain that ...
it is certain that ...
es obvio que ...
it is obvious that ...
it is obvious that ...
estar seguro que ...
to be sure that ...
to be sure that ...
es verdad que ...
it is true that ...
it is true that ...
no cabe duda que ...
there's no doubt that ...
there's no doubt that ...
no es dudoso que ...
it is not doubtful that ...
it is not doubtful that ...
no hay duda que ...
there is no doubt that ...
there is no doubt that ...
Credit goes to Study Spanish. All I did was make a summary.
A good explanation :) I would like to learn Spanish when I am confident with my German. Spanish is on my list of languages I want to speak.
ReplyDeleteNice :) for me it's the other way around - I want to learn German after Spanish
ReplyDeleteGood idea to learn German as well! I always say that it is easier for German people to learn Dutch than for Dutch people to learn German because of the complexity of the German grammar. The German case system is a bit tricky for Durch and English natives. But both languages belong to the Germanic language group, so you have an andvantage to learn German and Swedish. Fasulye
ReplyDeleteSpanish - English - German
ReplyDeletecreer que ... = to believe that ... = glauben, dass...
no dudar que ... = not to doubt that ... = nicht daran zweifeln, dass...
es cierto que ... = it is certain that ... = es ist sicher, dass...
es claro que ... = it is clear that ... = es ist deutlich, dass...
es evidente que ... = it is certain that ... = es ist sicher, dass...
es obvio que ... = it is obvious that ... = es ist offensichtlich, dass...
estar seguro que ... = to be sure that ... = sicher sein, das...
es verdad que ... = it is true that ... = es stimmt, dass...
no cabe duda que ... = there is no doubt that... = es besteht kein Zweifel, dass...
no es dudoso que ... =it is not doubtful that ... = es ist nicht zweifelhaft, dass...
no hay duda que ... = there is no doubt that ... = es besteht kein Zweifel, dass...
Fasulye
Spanish grammar is quite similar to English grammar. If you combine it with Dutch grammar, the scructire isn't that much different, except for the fact that you don't say the pronouns most of the time.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I had to memorize all these freakin' tables in Spanish for college, but then discovered that tenses I hadn't learned through rote memorization but just through input stuck as well as the memorized verbs. So there's no real need to memorize the forms as long you're getting enough Spanish input.
I've decided that I really hate memorizing conjugations from charts. Now I do it from exposure and repeated practice where it becomes engrained and remembers...rather than memorized out of context and remembered. I agree with Ramses that input is important here.
ReplyDeleteYeah.. I never do this anymore xD And I never actually did, I realised pretty much after I wrote this that it doesn't work
ReplyDelete